Arizona Attorney General Food Headline Medicine Watch Meissinger Family

Arizona Attorney General Demands Health Impact News Take Down Story on Medical Kidnapping in Violation of 1st Amendment

Baby Keaton not censored
Baby Keaton not censored

Baby Protecting Providers and the State Attorney General’s Workplace don’t need the general public to know concerning the medical kidnapping of the Meissinger household’s two toddler sons, and have demanded that Health Impact News‘ protection of the story be taken down. Learn the story we’ll NOT take down right here.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

In October (2018) we introduced you the story of a younger couple’s state of affairs in Arizona, the place each of their toddler sons have been faraway from their household by the Division of Baby Security, Arizona’s model of CPS (Youngster Safety Providers).

They misplaced their first son, Keaton, at 2 months of age after taking him to the physician shortly after receiving a number of vaccines and turning into sick. A Youngster Abuse Pediatrician at Phoenix Youngsters’s Hospital, Dr. Cynthia Nelson, reported that Keaton had been abused based mostly on medical proof.

And whereas the mother and father haven’t but been discovered responsible of any crime in an ongoing investigation, an investigation in which different docs have allegedly weighed in and disagreed with Dr. Cynthia Nelson, the State of Arizona additionally eliminated the Meissinger’s second son 48 hours after he was born, just because there was an open investigation relating to their first child.

Learn the complete story right here:

Arizona Mother and father Falsely Accused of Baby Abuse Lose Toddler Son – Have 2-Day-Previous New child Additionally Medically Kidnapped

Colleen O'Donnell-Smith with friends at concert - photo from Facebook

Arizona Assistant Attorney General Colleen O’Donnell-Smith (second from left) is demanding that Health Impact News take down their story concerning the Medical Kidnapping of the Meissinger infants. Picture from Fb.

This story has drawn nationwide consideration, and Health Impact News lately acquired an e mail from the mom, Briana, explaining that the Arizona Attorney General workplace was demanding that we take down their story:

I’ve been instructed by the Assistant Attorney General (Colleen O’Donnell-Smith) to put in writing you a proper letter to request the removing of the article that was revealed about our household and youngsters; the AAG said that I’m to request this as a result of the article accommodates info that violates confidential info of the case.

So, this e-mail is being despatched to suffice the request of a proper request to take away the article from the web site

I want to make clear and have in writing that each one communication that was offered to you, was given to you on my own, and that you simply by no means had contact nor have been you ever provided any info by my husband, Jordan Meissinger, in order that if there are any penalties incurred for our involvement, they fall on me, and me alone- as I’m prepared to simply accept duty for my actions.

Nevertheless, I additionally want to notice that I used to be not conscious that I used to be violating any legal guidelines, moderately, training and using my 1st ammendment proper, and I used to be not conscious talking about what my household goes via contradicts or disqualifies me of working towards my 1st modification proper.

Thanks on your time, and I sit up for your response on how we will resolve this matter.

Variety regards,

1st Amendment Routinely Violated in State-Sponsored Baby Kidnappings When Youngsters go into Foster Care

Censorship newspaper headline on the US Constitution -- First Amendment and free speech

We now have been publishing tales about state-sponsored baby kidnappings on our web site for over four years now, and this isn’t the primary time we now have been advised we should take away one of our articles.

We’ve got by no means complied with these calls for and threats, and we’re NOT going to start out now.

These calls for are directed in the direction of traumatized mother and father whereas protecting their youngsters captive, and are often accompanied by an unconstitutional gag order to attempt to silence the mother and father.

We have now had judges from Arizona in the previous make comparable calls for of Health Impact News (see: Arizona Judges Proceed to Threaten Mother and father and Prohibit Free Speech, and 10 and 12 Yr Previous Sisters Seized from Household by Hospital in Phoenix), and the Arizona DCF has made comparable calls for (see: Arizona DCF Tries to Stifle Free Speech in Medical Kidnapping Case – Demands Our Tales of Coumpy Household be Taken Down).

Nevertheless, I consider that is the primary time that a State Attorney General has made such a requirement.

Here’s a description of the workplace of Attorney General as outlined by the Arizona State Attorney General Web site:

The Attorney General serves because the chief authorized officer of the State. The Attorney General is remitted by our structure and elected to a four-year time period by the individuals of Arizona.

The Attorney General’s Workplace is the most important regulation workplace in the State. The Workplace is split into:

  • Legal Division
  • State Authorities Division
  • Youngster and Household Safety Division
  • Civil Litigation Division
  • Solicitor General’s Workplace
  • Communications Division
  • Operations

Mark Brnovich is the present Arizona Attorney General, elected into workplace by the individuals of Arizona.

Arizona Assistant Attorney General Colleen O’Donnell-Smith apparently works in the Youngster and Household Safety Division, Durango Unit #2. She is a public servant, and may apparently be contacted right here.

The Attorney General Workplace contact web page is right here.

Attorneys working inside the workplace of the State Attorney General workplace ought to be well-versed in the U.S. Structure, and particularly the First Amendment which protects Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press.

By intimidating mother and father whose youngsters are held in captivity by the State, and demanding that they not converse out towards any alleged abuse occurring with the kidnapping of their youngsters, is a transparent violation of the intent and objective of the First Amendment contained in the Invoice or Rights.

Right here is a component of the textual content of the Preamble of the Invoice of Rights, stating the aim of these “rights:”

THE Conventions of a quantity of the States, having on the time of their adopting the Structure, expressed a want, in order to stop misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that additional declaratory and restrictive clauses must be added: And as extending the bottom of public confidence in the Authorities, will greatest make sure the beneficent ends of its establishment.

Clearly, the Invoice of Rights, and different amendments to the U.S. Structure that adopted, have been meant to guard residents of the USA from abuses in authorities.

Right here is the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no regulation respecting an institution of faith, or prohibiting the free train thereof; or abridging the liberty of speech, or of the press; or the fitting of the individuals peaceably to assemble, and to petition the federal government for a redress of grievances.

So on what foundation do authorities officers intimidate mother and father and members of the press like us, making an attempt to silence us, which seems to be such a blatant violation of the Invoice of Rights and the First Amendment?

Most states have handed some type of “confidentiality law” which is used as justification to maintain proceedings in household or juvenile courts secret, away from public scrutiny.

Nevertheless, simply because a State Regulation is on the books permitting officers to intimidate and silence mother and father and/or members of the Press, doesn’t imply that the regulation is Constitutional. Many, if not most, of these legal guidelines might in all probability be challenged in Federal courts as to their Constitutionality with very favorable outcomes.

The regulation we now have seen often referred to in Arizona is the Arizona Revised Statutes Title Eight on “Child Safety.”

The part on “Confidentiality” is Eight-542:

A. It’s illegal, apart from functions for which information and data or social data or elements of or info from information and data or social data have been launched pursuant to part Eight-541, or apart from functions permitted by order of the courtroom, for any individual to knowingly disclose, obtain or make use of, or authorize, knowingly allow, take part in or acquiesce in the use of, any info concerned in any continuing beneath this text instantly or not directly derived from the information, data, stories or different papers compiled pursuant to this text or acquired in the course of the efficiency of official duties.

B. An individual who knowingly discloses info in violation of this part is responsible of a category 2 misdemeanor.

C. This part doesn’t prohibit individuals employed by the courtroom, the division or a licensed youngster welfare company from conducting the investigations or performing different duties pursuant to this text and achieved inside the regular course of their employment.

We’ve had a number of studies through the years from mother and father who declare that they’ve been threatened with jail time if they don’t adjust to a gag order, or refuse to take down an internet site or Fb Web page that incorporates footage of their youngsters who at the moment are in Foster Care.

And whereas to our information no decide has of but adopted via with implementing that menace (perhaps as a result of they know it isn’t Constitutional?), what number of mother and father in Arizona know that the regulation states this specific “offense” is simply a “class 2 misdemeanor?”

What about part C of Eight-542 the place the regulation states:

“This section does not prohibit persons employed by the court, the division or a licensed child welfare agency from conducting the investigations or performing other duties pursuant to this article and done within the normal course of their employment.”

What’s the function of this part, and the way is it used?

Double Requirements: Mother and father Might not Submit Footage or Info About Their Personal Youngsters, however State Businesses Can for the Objective of Adoption

Whether or not justified by Eight-542 part C or not, it’s straightforward to see the double requirements of imposing gag orders towards mother and father and demanding that information organizations like Health Impact News take away any photographs or details about youngsters in Foster Care, when State businesses do this very very same factor.

Here’s a screenshot from a tax-payer funded Arizona authorities web site, the place anybody can principally put in an order for a kid to undertake, based mostly on search standards:

Arizona Order A Child to Adopt

After getting into search parameters, outcomes might be proven with footage (typically even movies as nicely), and a full profile of the kid presently in Foster Care:

Arizona Adopt Order Child Search Results

And this is only one instance. There are numerous different such websites as properly.

So whereas the State intimidates and threatens mother and father who submit pictures and details about their youngsters who’ve been positioned into Foster Care, the State has no qualms about advertising those self same youngsters for adoption, which brings in large quantities of federal funding.

CPS and Foster Care = Baby Trafficking

Billions of taxpayer funds are spent annually on the Youngster Welfare system, which employs a whole lot of hundreds of individuals, from Baby Abuse Pediatricians to Social Staff to Judges and apparently to Attorney Generals as properly, amongst many, many others.

We’ve got documented a lot through the years concerning the abuses of this technique, which MUST take youngsters away from their households in order to outlive and obtain authorities funds, and has principally grow to be a Youngster Trafficking System.

And so long as the 1st Amendment nonetheless stands, we’ll proceed to show this evil system that’s destroying lives and households.

Remark on this text at

To study extra see:

The U.S. Foster Care System: Trendy Day Slavery and Youngster Trafficking

Baby Kidnapping and Trafficking: A Profitable U.S. Enterprise Funded by Taxpayers

Medical Kidnapping in the U.S. – Kidnapping Youngsters for Drug Trials

Are New Pediatric “Child Abuse Specialists” Inflicting an Improve in Medical Kidnappings?

Baby Intercourse Trafficking via Youngster “Protection” Providers Uncovered – Kidnapping Youngsters for Intercourse

Medical Kidnapping: A Menace to Each Household in America T-Shirt


100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order right here!

Medical Kidnapping is REAL!

See: Medical Kidnapping: A Menace to Each Household in America At this time

Assist unfold the notice of Medical Kidnapping by sporting the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!

Help the trigger of, which is a component of the Health Impact News community.

Order right here!

If you recognize people who find themselves skeptical and can’t consider that medical kidnapping occurs in the U.S. at the moment, that is the guide for them! Backed with strong references and actual life examples, they will be unable to disclaim the plain proof earlier than them, and can turn into higher educated on this matter that’s destroying the American household.

Medical Kidnapping final

1 Guide – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Delivery Out there!
Now: $14.99
Order right here!


2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for two books)
FREE Delivery Out there!
Now: $19.99 (for two books)
Order right here!

Additionally obtainable as eBook:


eBook – Obtain Instantly!


Revealed on November 1, 2018

s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)(window, doc,’script’,
fbq(‘init’, ‘928755773879843’);